Tribunals · London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · 2017 rating list

First And Second Floor Rear, 10 Hammersmith Grove, W6 7AP

Office and premises Decided 19 February 2025 CHG100858314 Lambert Smith Hampton - Birmingham CCA

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£1,020,000£460/m²
Ratepayer sought£980,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£980,000£440/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of £1,020,000, proposing £980,000 based on a reduced price per square metre from £460/m² to £440/m². The appellant's representative presented rental evidence from the actual lease and identified 35 comparable assessments within the same scheme that had been reduced to £440/m², establishing a clear tone of value. The tribunal found the VO's adopted rate of £460/m² excessive and allowed the appeal, confirming the lower rate of £440/m² supported by the comparable assessments and rental analysis.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Accor UK Business and Leisure Hotels Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
27 January 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.