Tribunals · London Borough of Hounslow · 2017 rating list

UNIT 7 FAIRWAY TRADING ESTATE, FAIRWAY CLOSE, TW4 6BU

Warehouse and premises Decided 25 June 2024 CHG101057189 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£90,000£85/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£107,000
Tribunal decided£90,000£85/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the unit price should be reduced from £85/m2 to £75/m2 across all three warehouse properties. The tribunal reviewed rental evidence from comparables and comparable assessments, including rents from 2015 and similar-sized warehouses on nearby estates. The tribunal found that £85/m2 was supported by comparable rental evidence and prior tribunal decisions, and therefore dismissed appeals for Units 7 and 10 at Fairway Trading Estate. However, for Units 4 & 5 at Central Park Estate, the tribunal allowed the appeal in part to reflect a reduction from £108,000 to £107,000 RV due to partial heating identified during a pre-hearing inspection.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Steelo Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
30 May 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hounslow · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.