THE HUT GROUP ICON MANCHESTER, SUNBANK LANE, WA15 0TP
Warehouses, offices and premises Decided 15 October 2025 CHG101075551 CBRE - Mark Hayes
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, a leaseholder at a Manchester warehouse complex, sought to split Icon 4 (a self-contained building) from the hereditament with effect from 18 February 2022, arguing it was separately occupiable and that the appellant had vacated it. The tribunal dismissed the appeal on the grounds that the original hereditament (£3,220,000 RV from 20 September 2021) had been superseded by a new assessment of £4,710,000 RV with effect from 25 August 2021, following expansion at the site, and therefore no longer existed to split. The tribunal also found on substantive grounds that even if it could consider the split, Icon 4 would have remained part of the single hereditament as the appellant retained paramount control and rateable occupation of the whole site at the proposed split date.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was THEHUT.COM LIMITED, represented.
Grounds argued
- Split or merge the assessment · decisive
- Evidence
- Expert report
- Cases cited
- Woolway (VO) v Mazars [2015] UKSC 53; Gardiner & Theobold LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 16 September 2025
Similar decisions
- THE HUT GROUP, ICON, SUNBANK LANE, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
- The Hut Group Icon, Manchester, Sunbank Lane, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
- THE HUT GROUP, ICON, SUNBANK LANE, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
- The Hut Group Icon, Manchester, Sunbank Lane, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
All decisions in Manchester City Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.