Tribunals · Bristol City Council · 2017 rating list

Inn on the Green, 2 Filton Road, Filton, Filton, BS7 0PA

Public house and premises Decided 23 October 2024 CHG101095009 Chris Wright

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£72,000
Ratepayer sought£48,000
VO conceded first£65,600−9% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£65,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the 2017 compiled list RV of £72,000 proposing £48,000 based on an average of four comparable local pubs' valuations, arguing overtrading. The Valuation Officer reduced the entry to £65,500 using Fair Maintainable Turnover methodology with FMT of £525,000 (wet) and £200,000 (dry), reflecting actual trade figures. The tribunal found the VO's approach properly applied the Approved Guide for valuation of public houses, the FMT was close to verified actual trading, and the appellant provided no evidence to support claims of overtrading. The tribunal dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Odinns Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Trading receipts (pubs, hotels)
  • Valuation method
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Trading accounts, Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobold LLP v Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
4 October 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Bristol City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.