Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Bristol City Council · 2017 rating list

4 Rodney Place, BS8 4HY

Hotels and premises Decided 22 December 2025 CHG101154420 Rabbette

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2017 list£91,500
Ratepayer sought£38,000
VO conceded first£77,000−16% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£77,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (4 RODNEY PLACE, BRISTOL, BS8 4HY). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
THE WASHINGTON HOTEL, 9-15 ST PAULS ROAD, BRISTOL, BS8 1LX£74,250£58,000£67,500Dismissed
THE BERKELEY SQUARE HOTEL, 14/15 BERKELEY SQUARE, BRISTOL, BS8 1HB£160,000£80,000£139,000Dismissed
HOTEL CLIFTON, ST PAULS ROAD, BRISTOL, BS8 1LX£150,000£97,000£134,000Dismissed
4 RODNEY PLACE, BRISTOL, BS8 4HYThis appeal£91,500£38,000£77,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to value four Clifton hotels using the comparison method based on rental evidence from part of one property (11-13 St Paul's Road at £27,000 pa), arguing a rate of £1,123.86 per DBU. The tribunal found this rent review evidence unreliable—being dated 15 years earlier, relating to only part of one hereditament, and lacking information on how it was negotiated. The tribunal upheld the Respondent's valuation using the receipts and expenditure method, finding the actual turnover figures fairly represented FMT and rejecting the appellant's unsupported 15% overtrading adjustment. The tribunal considered the Respondent's range points and percentages reasonable given each property's characteristics.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Quarter, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Valuation method
  • Trading receipts (pubs, hotels)
Evidence
Rents, Trading accounts
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Arma Hotels v Corkish (VO) [2020] UKUT 0103 (LC); Arma Hotels Ltd v Bunyan (VO) [2023] UKUT 3 (LC)
Hearing
1 December 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Bristol City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.