Tribunals · Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council · 2017 rating list

ADVERTISING SITE 0403 0175 ON BUS SHELTER OPP, 148 BROOM ROAD, S60 2SR

Advertising rights and premises - digital displays at bus shelters Decided 14 November 2024 CHG101096084 Montagu Evans - Richard Wackett

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£2,550

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 21 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant contended that digital advertising displays should be valued using only the static bus shelter roadside base rates without uplift, arguing the digital mechanism was not rateable. The tribunal determined that while digital and static advertisements are distinct, digital displays command higher rental value due to greater commercial effectiveness, heightened exposure, and ability to display moving images. The tribunal rejected the VO's uplift of six as excessive and unsubstantiated, instead determining that a multiplier of three applied to the VOA's static base rates was fair and reasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Alight Bus Shelter Media Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Valuation method · decisive
Evidence
Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Fir Mill Ltd v Royton U.D.C; J C Decaux UK Ltd ME v Valuation Officer; Alight Bus Shelter Media Limited v Valuation Officer
Hearing
31 October 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.