BUILDING 4 (3RD FLR RIGHT MIDDLE), CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE
Offices and premises Decided 28 September 2026 CHG101270278 Ryan
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 9 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Building 4 (3rd Right Middle), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE). Every property is listed below.
The 9 properties in this decision
One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.
| Property | Original RV | Sought | Tribunal decided | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building 4 (Gnd Flr Left Rear), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £382,500 | — | £382,500 | Dismissed |
| Building 4 (Pt 1st Flr Rear – 2nd Flr), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £1,900,000 | — | £1,900,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 4 (3rd Right Middle), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YEThis appeal | £159,000 | — | £159,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 7, 5th Flr North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £600,000 | — | £600,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 7, 6th Flr, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £1,210,000 | — | £1,210,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 7, 11th Flr, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £1,210,000 | — | £1,210,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 11, 3rd Flr Right North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £335,000 | — | £335,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 11, 3rd Flr Left North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £141,000 | — | £141,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 11, 3rd Flr South, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £620,000 | — | £620,000 | Dismissed |
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants sought a reduction in RV to reflect a lower tone of £440 per m2, arguing the office market had declined between the 2017 and 2023 lists. The Tribunal found the present unadjusted prices of £465 and £475 per m2 were reasonable based on rental evidence analysed at £511–£588 per m2. The Tribunal rejected the appellants' adjustments for landlord's repairs as the leases were effectively FRI with costs recovered by service charge, and found no support for the proposed £50 per m2 Cat A uplift.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Airplus International, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Bunyan (Valuation Officer) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 4 September 2026
Similar decisions
- 3RD FLR LEFT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- BUILDING 4 (GND FLR LEFT REAR) CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR RIGHT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR SOUTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Hounslow · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.