BUILDING 4 (GND FLR LEFT REAR) CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE
Offices and premises Decided 28 September 2026 CHG101270294 Ryan
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 9 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Building 4 (Gnd Flr Left Rear), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE). Every property is listed below.
The 9 properties in this decision
One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.
| Property | Original RV | Sought | Tribunal decided | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building 4 (Gnd Flr Left Rear), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YEThis appeal | £382,500 | — | £382,500 | Dismissed |
| Building 4 (Pt 1st Flr Rear – 2nd Flr), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £1,900,000 | — | £1,900,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 4 (3rd Right Middle), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £159,000 | — | £159,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 7, 5th Flr North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £600,000 | — | £600,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 7, 6th Flr, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £1,210,000 | — | £1,210,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 7, 11th Flr, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £1,210,000 | — | £1,210,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 11, 3rd Flr Right North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £335,000 | — | £335,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 11, 3rd Flr Left North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £141,000 | — | £141,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 11, 3rd Flr South, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £620,000 | — | £620,000 | Dismissed |
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants, represented by Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited, sought a reduced unadjusted price of £440 per m² based on rental evidence analysis, arguing the properties should reflect the inferior office market in April 2021 compared to 2017. The tribunal found that the Valuation Officer's rental evidence (ranging from £511 to £570.27 per m²) supported the present unadjusted prices of £465 and £475 per m², that the appellant's adjustments for landlord's repairs were not justified as rents were effectively FRI with costs recovered through service charges, and that the quantum differential between larger and smaller properties was appropriately reflected. The tribunal dismissed the appeals, confirming the existing valuations.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited (on behalf of multiple companies), represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Valuation method
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Bunyan (Valuation Officer) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 4 September 2026
Similar decisions
- 3RD FLR LEFT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- BUILDING 4 (3RD FLR RIGHT MIDDLE), CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR RIGHT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR SOUTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Hounslow · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.