7 TH FLR EAST 1000, GREAT WEST ROAD, TW8 9ES
Offices and premises Decided 11 June 2021 CHG100185485 Ryan
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable value seeking a reduction from £96,500 to £77,000, arguing the Respondent's adopted tone of £175/m² was excessive and should be £160/m². The Valuation Officer had already reduced it to £84,500. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the £175/m² rate was supported by the available rental evidence within the appeal building, with comparable properties at November 2014 to September 2015 showing rents analysed between £160.52/m² and £188.72/m², and adopting a 7% yield for incentive adjustments was the correct methodology.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Avia Reps UK Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Garton v Hunter
- Hearing
- 14 May 2021
Similar decisions
- 3RD FLR LEFT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- BUILDING 4 (3RD FLR RIGHT MIDDLE), CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR RIGHT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- BUILDING 4 (GND FLR LEFT REAR) CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Hounslow · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.