GND FLR 711 VANSTON PLACE, SW6 1AY
Shop and Premises Decided 19 October 2022 CHG100530493 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant (a health clinic) challenged the rateable value of £104,000, arguing for £83,000 based on a zone A rate of £575/m² and a 10% shape allowance for the property's high width/depth ratio. The Valuation Officer defended £104,000 based on a zone A rate of £650/m². The tribunal found that while the VO's zone A rate of £650/m² was excessive, the appellant's proposed 10% shape allowance lacked sufficient evidence. The tribunal adopted a zone A rate of £575/m² based on comparable rental evidence from 18-22 Vanston Place and the passing rent, determining the RV at £92,500.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was MyHealthcare Clinic Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Zoning or layout
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 22 September 2022
Similar decisions
- 20, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 28 A & 28B, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 32, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 28, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.