Clockhouse Place, Bedfont Road, TW14 8HD
Detached office building Decided 1 February 2024 CHG100749331 Colliers
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the £2,410,000 rateable value (based on £220 per m²), arguing it was unreasonable for a standalone office building in a mainly residential area near Heathrow Airport. The tribunal found that the original valuation inappropriately treated the property as comparable to offices within the Bedfont Lakes business park. The tribunal preferred tonal evidence of other standalone offices in the wider locality (valued at £130-£170 per m²) and determined that £150 per m² was reasonable, confirming the proposed value of £1,670,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was SAP, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Ltd [2023] UKUT 17 (LC)
- Hearing
- 11 January 2024
Similar decisions
- 3RD FLR LEFT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- BUILDING 4 (3RD FLR RIGHT MIDDLE), CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR RIGHT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- BUILDING 4 (GND FLR LEFT REAR) CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Hounslow · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.