Tribunals · London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · 2017 rating list

1046, Westfield Shopping Centre, Ariel Way, Ariel Way, W12 7GB

Shop and premises Decided 25 April 2025 CHG101103122 Knight Frank - Matthew Fanning

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£300,000£3200/m²
Ratepayer sought£257,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£300,000£3200/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction in rateable value for two units in Westfield Shopping Centre, London, arguing the valuation base rate should be £2,750/m² rather than the listed £3,200/m². The appellant relied on rental evidence from adjacent Units 1043-1044, which had lower rents. The tribunal found that while this evidence merited some weight, the subject properties occupied a more prominent corner location with better frontage and visibility than the comparable units, and were directly opposite higher-value units. The tribunal concluded that a hypothetical tenant would pay more for these superior properties and upheld the original valuations.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Bucherer UK Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Denton v TH White Ltd; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
11 April 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.