Sky, Grant Way, TW7 5QD
TV Studios, Offices, and Premises Decided 27 March 2026 CHG101121769 WSP
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought an allowance for fragmentation of the 37-acre site comprising nine office buildings and other features, initially requesting 20% at the challenge stage and reducing to 7.5% before the hearing. The Valuation Officer argued that any disadvantage was already reflected in the £125/m² main space rate and cited comparable properties with higher rates. The tribunal found that the piecemeal construction of the subject property created material fragmentation warranting an allowance, as a hypothetical tenant would factor in costs and inefficiencies arising from multiple dispersed buildings. The tribunal awarded a 2.5% fragmentation allowance, finding persuasive support from the January 2026 Hut Group decision, resulting in revised rateable values ranging from £9,750,000 to £10,580,000 across the material dates.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was SKY UK LIMITED, represented.
Grounds argued
- Zoning or layout
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Evidence
- Settled assessments, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson; FC Brown Steel Equipment Ltd v Karl Hopkins; The Hut Group
- Hearing
- 6 February 2026
Similar decisions
- BUILDING 4 (3RD FLR RIGHT MIDDLE), CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR RIGHT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR LEFT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- BUILDING 4 (GND FLR LEFT REAR) CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Hounslow · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.