BUILDING 4 (PT 1ST FLR REAR - 2ND FLR), CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE
Offices and premises Decided 28 September 2026 CHG101309021 Ryan
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 9 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Building 4 (Pt 1st Flr Rear – 2nd Flr), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE). Every property is listed below.
The 9 properties in this decision
One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.
| Property | Original RV | Sought | Tribunal decided | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building 4 (Gnd Flr Left Rear), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £382,500 | — | £382,500 | Dismissed |
| Building 4 (Pt 1st Flr Rear – 2nd Flr), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YEThis appeal | £1,900,000 | — | £1,900,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 4 (3rd Right Middle), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £159,000 | — | £159,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 7, 5th Flr North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £600,000 | — | £600,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 7, 6th Flr, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £1,210,000 | — | £1,210,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 7, 11th Flr, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £1,210,000 | — | £1,210,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 11, 3rd Flr Right North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £335,000 | — | £335,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 11, 3rd Flr Left North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £141,000 | — | £141,000 | Dismissed |
| Building 11, 3rd Flr South, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE | £620,000 | — | £620,000 | Dismissed |
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants challenged the rateable values of nine office properties at Chiswick Park on grounds that the unadjusted prices of £465-£475 per m2 were excessive, proposing £440 per m2 based on rental evidence analysis. The tribunal found the appellants' analysis, which deducted for landlord repairs and applied a £50 per m2 uplift for fit-out, was not persuasive, as the actual lettings were on effective full repairing terms recovered through service charges. The tribunal confirmed the original valuations, considering the available rental evidence supported the present tone, and found no reason to depart from the reflection of quantum between properties below and above 1,000 m2.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Airplus International, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Bunyan (Valuation Officer) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 4 September 2026
Similar decisions
- 3RD FLR LEFT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- BUILDING 4 (3RD FLR RIGHT MIDDLE), CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR RIGHT NORTH BUILDING 11, CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YA — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
- BUILDING 4 (GND FLR LEFT REAR) CHISWICK PARK, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YE — Dismissed, 28 Sept 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Hounslow · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.