Tribunals · London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · 2023 rating list

26 A, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH

Shop and premises Decided 9 July 2026 CHG101379979 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV—£660/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£54,500£590/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 5 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the 2023 rating list tone of £660 per m2, seeking a reduction to £540 per m2, arguing that rental evidence closest to the antecedent valuation date (particularly 28A & 28B Goldhawk Road and 41-43a Goldhawk Road) supported the lower figure. The tribunal found that whilst £660 per m2 was unreasonable, £540 per m2 was too low when considering the totality of evidence including 3 Goldhawk Road; the tribunal determined £590 per m2 was reasonable, allowing the appeals in part with revised rateable values.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was AL-ANAKA LTD, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
12 June 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.