Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Hounslow · 2023 rating list

11TH FLR BUILDING 7, CHISWICK PARK, 566, CHISWICK HIGH ROAD, W4 5YG

Offices and premises Decided 28 September 2026 CHG101363764 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2023 list£1,210,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£1,210,000

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 9 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Building 7, 11th Flr, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE). Every property is listed below.

The 9 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Building 4 (Gnd Flr Left Rear), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE£382,500—£382,500Dismissed
Building 4 (Pt 1st Flr Rear – 2nd Flr), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE£1,900,000—£1,900,000Dismissed
Building 4 (3rd Right Middle), Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE£159,000—£159,000Dismissed
Building 7, 5th Flr North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE£600,000—£600,000Dismissed
Building 7, 6th Flr, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE£1,210,000—£1,210,000Dismissed
Building 7, 11th Flr, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YEThis appeal£1,210,000—£1,210,000Dismissed
Building 11, 3rd Flr Right North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE£335,000—£335,000Dismissed
Building 11, 3rd Flr Left North, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE£141,000—£141,000Dismissed
Building 11, 3rd Flr South, Chiswick Park, Chiswick High Road, London W4 5YE£620,000—£620,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants, represented by Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited, argued that the rating list entries were inaccurate and sought revised RVs based on an unadjusted price of £420 per m², later revised to £440 per m², relying on analysed rental evidence ranging from £301.88 to £438.67 per m². The Tribunal found that the appellants' analysis inappropriately deducted for landlord's repairs and insurance when the properties were effectively let on FRI terms recovered through service charges, and that the appellants' analyses failed to adequately uplift Cat A transactions to Cat B terms or reflect quantum differences. The Tribunal confirmed the present unadjusted prices of £465 and £475 per m² as reasonable, supported by the Valuation Officer's rental evidence which analysed substantially higher, and dismissed the appeals.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Airplus International, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Bunyan (Valuation Officer) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
4 September 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hounslow · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.